about the firm
next 10 days
contact us
home
recent case victories
DL hearing wins
published works
penalties for DUI
dui law update
strong case?
Law Offices of
Randy Goodis, P.A.

888-DUI-8DUI - Toll Free
305-389-1833 - 24 hours
31-32 of 32
The following is an update of the firm's most recent court victories. In this entire list, no one
was convicted of DUI. To view the firm's most recent driver's license victories please click on "DL Hearing wins".

31 Case No: 4223 EGV - DADE COUNTY - JUDGE MIRANDA - April 2007
Facts: My client was involved in a police chase that went through Miami-Dade County. When they stopped him he became sick and they had to take him to the hospital. They took blood at the hospital and it was almost 3 times the legal limit .217.
Result: Since my client did not do any of the roadside tests, the entire case was about the blood draw. At the time of the trial, I explained to the State that they could not get the blood draw into evidence. They panicked and asked for a continuance, which was denied, and they were forced to dismiss the DUI.
32 Case No: 05200557 MM10A - BROWARD COUNTY - JUDGE ZACK - March 2007
Facts: My client was stopped in a DUI checkpoint. He failed the roadside tests and refused the breath test.
Result: At the jail, he became ill and was taken to the hospital.  Blood was taken while at the hospital. On the day of the trial, the State realized that I was intending to introduce the medical blood results where are more reliable than the breath test results they were suing. The blood results showed that there was no alcohol in my client system.  The State decided to dismiss the DUI.
33 Case No: 056004169 MM10A - BROWARD COUNTY - JUDGE ROSS - February 2007
Facts: My client was stopped at a DUI checkpoint. He failed the roadsides and refused the breath test. This was my client 4th DUI. If he had lost this case, he would have lost his driver license permanently. He would have also had to go to jail and also would have had to pay numerous fines and costs.
Result: After taking all of the depositions, it was obvious that the State had numerous problems. They did not follow the procedures set out in the DUI guidelines and the officer who administered the roadside tests to my client made no mention of any DUI characteristics my client had and had no recollection of the roadside tests. Since this was a 4th DUI, a supervisor for the State was handling the case. They day before I was scheduled to argue these issues in court, she dismissed the DUI charge.
34 Case No: 503657W - MIAMI DADE COUNTY - JUDGE KRIEGER-MARTIN - February 2007
Facts: My client was stopped for speeding and failed all the roadside tests and admitted to having 6 beers. My client refused the breath test.
Result: The officer who conducted the roadside tests is one of the most distinguished DUI officers in Miami-Dade County. When the State provided me with all of the reports they intended to use, the page that showed how my client performed on the roadside tests was missing. When I took this officer deposition, I had him admit that he had no recollection of these tests and that he had to use his reports to remember said tests. Since this report was missing, he had no way of refreshing his recollection of these tests. Without any recollection, the tests did not come into evidence and the DUI had to be dismissed.
35 Case No: 05025007 MM10A - BROWARD COUNTY - JUDGE ZACK - January 2007
Facts: My client was stopped for speeding on west-bound I-595.  The trooper testified that his speed was over 100 miles per hour. My client failed the roadside tests and blew .095.
Result: For an unknown reason, the trooper did not activate his video camera for the speeding infraction and had no explanation for not having the sound working on the video tape. After arguing several motions on these issues, the State decided to offer my client a reckless driving and dismiss the DUI.